Readers of this space read last week about the protests over Cairn Energy’s production activities in the Arctic.  Today’s WSJ has a nice piece by James Herron (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704206804575467390218464732.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews) that reports on the end of the Greenpeace protest.  Did they stop their protest due to objections from the Greenland government?  No.  Did they see the error of their ways?  Nope.  Turns out, it’s darn cold up there in the Arctic!

Here’s Herron:

“Four Greenpeace protesters had attached themselves to the bottom of the rig, halting drilling operations for around 40-hours. They abandoned the protest Thursday due to freezing weather conditions by climbing aboard the rig, where they were arrested.

“‘Last night was freezing and now the sea below us is churning and the wind is roaring. It’s time to come down,” said Sim McKenna, one of the protesters, in a statement shortly before abandoning the protest. “We’re proud we slowed the mad rush for Arctic oil, if only for a couple of days.’”

Roaring winds, churning seas and freezing temperatures — nobody can blame the not-so-intrepid protestors for ending this one.  Maybe next time they’ll get the “living in a California treehouse” protest duty.  Maybe they’re rookies.  Or maybe there’s some sort of Greenpeace lottery.

While it’s easy to make fun, the government of Greenland, which takes environment and safety seriously, also took the protest seriously, condeming it as ’a very grave and illegal attack on Greenland’s constitutional rights.’

“‘It is highly disturbing that Greenpeace in its chase on media attention with all measures breaks the safety regulations put in place to protect people and the environment,” the government said in a statement.”

It takes all kinds, one supposes, but it sure would be more helpful if Greenpeace could channel some of its energy into constructive activities — like say helping come up with a sensible path forward to a clean enery economy that could garner widespread political support?  Just a thought . . . .

Primary election results dominated the news this week, with climate and energy policy playing a key role.  The most surprising winner (pending absentee ballot results) was Alaska Republican Joe Miller, who appears well on his way to having defeated incumbent Lisa Murkowski, Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.   E&E News highlights Miller’s stance on energy ...

Read More

Gotta love the blog in this morning's FT by Masa Serdarevic entitled "Oil drilling in the Arctic?  Blame the bankers" ( http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2010/08/25/oil-drilling-in-the-arctic-blame-the-bankers/).  For those who think Arctic drilling controversies begin and end in ANWR, note that this one relates to exploration and production in Arctic Greenland. Visitors to ANWR regularly note that there seems in their experience no better place to put ...

Read More

What do road traffic congestion and energy have in common? The answer is simple: considerable amounts of fuel are wasted in congestion.  According to the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), 2.8 billion gallons of fuel were wasted in 2007 in 439 U.S. urban areas due to congestion. That is about 2 percent of our annual gasoline needs, or close to $8 ...

Read More

By now, we all know that Congress went to the August recess without passing any significant energy and climate legislation.  Interestingly, in the past years other nations have been working on long-term, well defined, national targets for clean energy deployment, implementing technology-specific incentives that reduce regulatory risks for investors.  For example, China, which does not have prices or caps on ...

Read More